Under the aegis of "same" and the Municipality was held on 5.6.2010, in Santo Stino di Livenza the presentation of two books of philosophy. This is from "The Leibnizian angelology" Matthias Geretto and "The science of small" Filiberto Battistin. Here are the opening remarks by Antonio Martin.
To give to Caesar what is Caesar see google, Bianca Tosatti, Figure security
ABOUT TWO PHILOSOPHICAL TEXTS: FIGURE DELL'ITERPRETAZIONE
debut. Terror is my daily bread. It 's something goes beyond the traditional fear of God 'something personal, microphysical. These two works serve as containment, at least in part, of horrific ghosts and obsessions that haunt my mind. They are not, it must be said, works in other works: they represent the fullness of the spirit, go (now with the language of science, now with the language of poetry) to the unstoppable flow of life on earth and after death, in other words, direct thought. Of what I pay and I do have to drive (a term dear to Matt) from their words, their silences and their original plan, as a humble instrument. Once known as the "instrument" should also be noted that the works themselves are "Tool" that leave those who read a wide freedom. This freedom is not abused, and good direct our thoughts so very well and good (expensive in terms Filiberto).
The whale. Considering the work of Matthias is an important figure. Crossing disputes that have lasted centuries Matt falls into the depths of theology, the Holy Scriptures, the Fathers, School of Philosophy, Doctrine and finally Leibniz in order to produce, making it appear on the surface, just as it used to do the whale, the vertigo of the depth and solitude of study and meditation. Return to the History of Philosophy a new reading of the German philosopher seeing if it is possible to reinterpret all his thought in the light and the light of the Angel. The system keeps stubbornly and finally, the monad becomes the "monad-angel" means a unit that is above man as the animals are below, in a continuum of creation that still wonder who is close to this interpretation.
L'Aquila. If Matt is the whale, Filiberto is the eagle. From Plato to Kant, to Nietzsche, from Descartes to Bonhoeffer, from Dante to Leopardi, from the Scriptures to his beloved and revered master Alessandro Biral. If Matt is moving on the vertical axis Filiberto moves on the horizontal axis. And second all-seeing "a little knowledge of love" that includes everything, nothing remains, everything gives. The flight over the debris of Western Civilization and the little that remains intact and untouched. It must be said that this discussion does not escape even the Eastern Tradition: From Confucius to Gandhi. And that tradition Filiberto reserve a nearly unconditional respect and admiration. E 'correspondence that is admired by those in the heart of civilization, reason and life, and in fact ends his book with the word China "Wen" (man made).
Style-Apparatus critical. Both of the authors fielding six languages \u200b\u200b(English, Italian, French, German, Greek, Latin). The difference is that Trai Filiberto these two languages \u200b\u200bto translate for his text, leaving only reveal the source of his sources, while Matt, once again willfully, obstinately indicates, with the rigor of the philologist, the source and the availability of passages quoted or commented. They are two different ways of understanding the relationship with the reader: Filiberto paves the way for a linear approach, a continuous reading that binds and extends to the whole work; Matthias, however, with his quotes and the untranslated Footnote page forces us to "jump" in that it is necessary to use a dictionary or some good friends translator: becomes that of Matthew and his readers with a reading room, a magnificent two-fold effort. If that Filiberto is a book to read and meditate, to Matthew is a book to study.
The cross. can also be asymmetrical, but this is not the case: the two noble animals have been mentioned previously (the whale and the eagle) well represent the sky and abyss, as the cross is between heaven and earth. That the cross is another image that may assist us in addressing these two texts. The vertical axis (the frame) is inherent in the work Matthias (think that's thoughtful and melancholy sink) The horizontal axis (the scaffold) is the symbol for Philibert as an eagle that dominates the geography of the scriptures and symbols. Intersection of the axes is a point on which both stress and it seems to agree: the presence and absence of God is no coincidence that the last word of "The Leibnizian Angelology" is "God" and 'last paragraph of a book titled Filiberto terrifying "Farewell." Filiberto argues with the theologians: a theology of reason to replace a theology of the flesh and spirit. On the other hand Matthew shows us the impossibility to understand the philosophy of Leibniz without Revelation. We must also think that the Christian cross has always been a central question, a question of life or death.
Art. says Matt: "that Leibniz is in fact a new synthesis, the fruit of his genius ability to rework creating . Filiberto says "come creator spiritus." Generation and creation are almost synonymous: invocations to the gods and the God of monotheism to grant us the grace of the foundation on which to build our humble buildings and between them, perhaps for the first, the Temple of Art.
Gloria. der wanderer says: "May God bless your cards"
