WITHDRAWAL SHORT
Twenty years later not I resume my thesis, because it is no longer in my possession, and perhaps even mine. E ' My duty, however, for possible future reference take up two or three issues that were placed in the text, trying to remember by heart. NB: I think the thesis is legally insignificant.
1. Christ and the evil.
Here I shake my wrists at the thought. I argued in 1990 that Christ was evil. The only motivation that I can now put forward is that Christ, the Messiah, himself God, Jesus has not dissolved all evil. Hence the corollary is also false that that was not God (but not hiding the Divinity of the generator), which was indeed an expression of Satan, Christ was the Antida. In fact I do not push so much: I had only had not defeated all the evil to be He himself evil. More specifically blamed him for not having overcome death. He in fact, according to the Scriptures, death has won. Death, which stands out clearly in the last chapter of the discussion, it is certainly something terrible and ineffable, from which the poetry is lost (maybe), but not an insurmountable limit.
2. Violence is not violence
I think I wrote "The violence is being claimed so." Identified about the 'being' with God now, that a "being" can be violent is a matter which may give rise to disputes which do not charge me for incompetence; but there might be a violent God is something very close to blasphemy, if not a real curse. Indeed, it is blasphemy. In the 1990 version was, this blasphemy, the remnants of the '70s, the years better known as the "years of lead". A sort of hypocrisy, not theater (which is much more true) had order established within me: so apparently elegant expression was sacrificed for the contents: the horrible deaths and the wounded, the grief. It 'obvious that the word "violence" should be replaced with the word "non-violence." I believe (but up to a certain extent) that the flow of thought it would have been stopped.
3. Suicide
The thesis ends, I think, four or five lines that went something like this:
Pistoia Pistoia
when I was hanged in front of your gate
as one who could not enter
Swear!
distantissimo I was not suicide and it seemed almost familiar. Here we take ... but my strength falter. A suicide, the threat, which is once again involved a woman, for over 17 years. Once a deified human creature to run these risks. I do not think you can make a speech on suicide itellegibile completely ... some have tried. The speech breaks inevitably on the madness and the same argument here is growing, perhaps dramatically. A minimum of hope in the mercy of God and the Madonna and the very few forces of man and woman, that does not disappear. If you do not find, if you do not look for the Deity, is a difficult order to avoid this almost indescribable. The speech is temporarily suspended
Antonio Martin
Twenty years later not I resume my thesis, because it is no longer in my possession, and perhaps even mine. E ' My duty, however, for possible future reference take up two or three issues that were placed in the text, trying to remember by heart. NB: I think the thesis is legally insignificant.
1. Christ and the evil.
Here I shake my wrists at the thought. I argued in 1990 that Christ was evil. The only motivation that I can now put forward is that Christ, the Messiah, himself God, Jesus has not dissolved all evil. Hence the corollary is also false that that was not God (but not hiding the Divinity of the generator), which was indeed an expression of Satan, Christ was the Antida. In fact I do not push so much: I had only had not defeated all the evil to be He himself evil. More specifically blamed him for not having overcome death. He in fact, according to the Scriptures, death has won. Death, which stands out clearly in the last chapter of the discussion, it is certainly something terrible and ineffable, from which the poetry is lost (maybe), but not an insurmountable limit.
2. Violence is not violence
I think I wrote "The violence is being claimed so." Identified about the 'being' with God now, that a "being" can be violent is a matter which may give rise to disputes which do not charge me for incompetence; but there might be a violent God is something very close to blasphemy, if not a real curse. Indeed, it is blasphemy. In the 1990 version was, this blasphemy, the remnants of the '70s, the years better known as the "years of lead". A sort of hypocrisy, not theater (which is much more true) had order established within me: so apparently elegant expression was sacrificed for the contents: the horrible deaths and the wounded, the grief. It 'obvious that the word "violence" should be replaced with the word "non-violence." I believe (but up to a certain extent) that the flow of thought it would have been stopped.
3. Suicide
The thesis ends, I think, four or five lines that went something like this:
Pistoia Pistoia
when I was hanged in front of your gate
as one who could not enter
Swear!
distantissimo I was not suicide and it seemed almost familiar. Here we take ... but my strength falter. A suicide, the threat, which is once again involved a woman, for over 17 years. Once a deified human creature to run these risks. I do not think you can make a speech on suicide itellegibile completely ... some have tried. The speech breaks inevitably on the madness and the same argument here is growing, perhaps dramatically. A minimum of hope in the mercy of God and the Madonna and the very few forces of man and woman, that does not disappear. If you do not find, if you do not look for the Deity, is a difficult order to avoid this almost indescribable. The speech is temporarily suspended
Antonio Martin
