Blood Drops Before Mensus
Dialogue between summer and Miras Traverso report of Nicolai Nartmann July 29, 2009
Dear Pep:
I'm reading a book, you'll probably be interested , The Philosophy of German idealism, of Nicolai Hartmann.
The first volume: The followers of Kant, decomposition or misinterpretation of Kant, then, Fichte, Schelling then, after the Romantics - Holderlin, Novalis ... just in Schlaiermacher-The second volume is Hegel P -500. Says that the logic of Hegel is an ontology. The book is translated or, in Ed South America and is on university faculties. I recommended it for years, many, Manuel Ballestero, Marxist Hegelian, knowingly. It has helped me already, I'm going to Hegel, in the second vol-to know which parts of Fichte and Schelling are the genesis of our praxeology.
In Schelling's transcendental idealism Your System (1801), not its philosophy of nature, later. Fichte his Doctrine of Science in 1794 and making their introductions to it in 1797 (found in book set), not its absolute metaphysical theological later edited with the same title as a rewriting of the text, etc. Castilian Certainly in the current translation of Fichte is not what interests us, Akal has resulted in the reworking of 1811, theological. Yes there is an issue of Aguilar 1975 which is the 1794, but I have not caught ...
Well this is the news I wanted comentarte.Seguimos around my vacation. A hug
Joaquin
July 29, 2009,
Dear Joaquin, it interests me much Hartmann's book, but is accessible to people? "You have bought in a bookstore?. Tell me if you have not gone on vacation.
These days I have "spoken" frequently with Joan on the subject of late Stoicism do not know if I put a little shrimp as there was a kind of Florence Gauthier response to it without missing him right in what he posed.
therefore I have read lately, Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius. Now I come in Cicero.
Joan told me that he had given the de finibus (is this the Latin name?) And it makes a difference, has raised the level in the first book I'm impressed by the prose Cicero .
I would write something about classical Greece, as has been C. Castoriadis, we'll see if the heat allows.
Hugs
Pep Traverso
August 21, 2009
Dear Pep:
Until I'm back from vacation I could not read your message. I've been in a place where no internet and not even no possibility of talking on mobile phone. As Hartmann makes the book, I have photocopies of the two volumes and I can go when you those come around. In person or through Joan. is a very interesting book, because you can see what line training Hegel. Since Kant, it is not working, but for which party and which is what gives the rotation of the self and establishes it as the center of Hegel's philosophy to the work of Fichte, on average, which serves to eliminate the Kantian transcendental ego and do result from the activity. I repeat that the book is very useful. There are three problems that must be taken into account. Hegel said he always had theological concerns, and therefore plays a lot in that direction. Lukcas says that is a lie invented by Dilthey (me, the truth, I do not see theology as I read of the Phenomenology, but it could be something of his work Logic). Hartmann said that Hegel is also heir to the romantic idealism. Lukacs says that's another nineteenth-century forgery. Here I dare to say that I do not see it either, according to Hartmann explains the ideas of the Romantics - L said that the interpretation of Holderlin as romantic is a hoax. Hartmann said that Hegel is a tough but fair critic of the illustration, at one point said that I was a "slave rebellion" - Lukacs says that Hegel is the direct heir of the same. Both put that Hegel was able to rescue all the philosophical legacy and use, I think that goes to church at least to Aristotle. His theory of the state is a radicalization of the already radical Aristotle on the human being is politikon zoom and changing the constitution is changed the polis. To Aristótels, as for Aristotle and Hegel, the social order is the result of constitutional law, this is not something to monitor an existing order, but is the totality of social relations, ordered civil society cives daily life in accordance with accepted principles all-in a given correlation of forces would add us, creates and directs civil society. Hegel adds radical historical consciousness and human plasticity. Two consequences: for Hegel the state is not eternal by nature, but it is "eternal" because no society, no "tribe" or human horde that has not made and preserved as normative principles-institutionalized social knowledge to respect and ensure respect - allowing reproduction and are accepted by all. That's his little joke idea, historically evolving constitution. That can be justified at the time heteronomously-the God of Israel orders
..."-. constitution as we understand it is for Hegel actually something that should be concordant with other items in the constitution a society, with the objective spirit, in its language, the body of knowledge of civilization that allow us to produce and reproduce society and living by our practice, "and if not, his example is the constitution that gives Spain Napoleon - Bayonne, which is rejected by the world of social and guerrilla insurgency.
Another item: liquid-like all true Aristotelian-contractarian weaknesses. The state is not a result of a previous individual wills from its prior capabilities that are alienated and access to representation. The state computer society and the rest of the objectification of the material culture of which it forms part, is that in the historical distribution is through material redistribution order, the rights and freedoms which establishes specific, skills and abilities of each individual, the degree of power and sovereignty, "the ethical history of each individual subject, which society does not pre-exist and are genetically produced by the existing social order, by the prevailing social relations that the state statue. For all this, is very close to Aristotle, again, ideas p. e.de
Vitoria, all of which do not fall into the contractualism-civil society-state result. They lack these radical denial dela nature to them the state and philosophy must discover and apply the rules that dictates the nature of human reason in order to guide human life. For Hegel, there is no idealistic nature, nature-man puts the human at least, also the "other" are always on the razor's edge to say something great about it as: science with which we study the physical nature is a human production, a powerful act of human imagination which develops ... and bullshit: nature is a product of mind (before Vico said something interesting: there are only human sciences, because only we know what we believe, only God could make natural science as such: a certain knowledge arose which is not the same as that of science, of praxis. Corto. Very interesting explanation of the objective spirit of Hartmann.
I do not know if you plan to work in this regard. I'm going to read now after finishing with a short text Fichte's Introduction to the theory of science (1934, is located on AbeBooks (trad Gaos) which is his explanation for beginners of his theories, 1794), Lukacs's book, then, before continuing with Chapter 6 of Phenomenology of esp, I re-read the prologue and the cpa 5. you see, we are delivering the program strictly on Marxism Lenin French political thought, German philosophical idealism. In addition to the extent it is possible to route absorbing everything that they could not absorb, our understanding of the RF is better, etc. After that I hope to go and Gramsci and Vygotsky, another Marxist Hegel, the ZPD is a conclusion the objective spirit.
On what I read of Hartmann wrote a text of 20 folios being in Cantabria, to fulfill the promises made to Salvador, but I was able to delete it without realizing it, almost like my table. Back to text Hartmann. Despite what I have identified as critical Quete think it is a very useful book and not waste time reading it. About the book of Cicero, the title is usually in Castilian of the supreme good and supreme evil-Gredos, eg. It is the opinion of Cicero on philosophy. As you know he studied in Athens. The summary makes the stoicism and puts into the mouth of Cato are dialogues style Plato is the text used by the French in their pre-university students to learn the Stoic ideas. I do not know where you read through this summary of Stoicism could know things would not have known. the book is easy to read and very interesting. I send copy to Joan. A hug
Joaquin
0 comments:
Post a Comment